|
Colorado's Energy Future: Our Perspective
Howard Geller, SWEEP
Ron Lehr, AWEA Western Representative
September 2006
Reliable, affordable, and cleaner sources of
electricity are vital to Colorado’s economic health and social
well-being. The new report by the Colorado Energy Forum, Colorado’s
Electricity Future, is correct in pointing out that Colorado will
need new electricity resources over the next 20 years. The key
question before us is which resources to choose.
We believe the choice should be renewable sources of
electricity such as wind and solar power, and improving the
efficiency of electricity use. Taken together, these are Colorado’s
most cost-effective, environmentally benign, and reliable new
resources. If aggressively pursued, these resources can meet all of
our growing energy service requirements over the next 10-20 years.
Increased reliance on conventional coal-fired power plants, on the
other hand, is a high-cost, high risk strategy that should be
avoided.
A forward-looking electricity policy Colorado should
focus on:
- Maximizing the implementation of cost-effective
energy efficiency measures, which could save consumers and
businesses over $1 billion net. Leading states and utilities are
reducing electricity use by 1% per year through energy efficiency
programs, more than twice the level of savings now being achieved in
Colorado. Vigorous energy efficiency efforts also, like those
supported by Governor Huntsman in Utah, would reduce pressure on
Colorado’s strained electricity transmission and distribution grids,
in addition to saving money.
- Expanding renewable electricity production from
wind power, solar, and biomass-based power well beyond the amounts
now required. Xcel Energy claims it will meet Amendment 37’s 10%
renewables requirement in 2007, eight years early. It is time to
raise the bar. Leading states such Nevada, California, and Hawaii
are requiring utilities to obtain at least 20% of their power from
renewable energy sources, twice the requirement now in place in
Colorado. Colorado has plentiful renewable resources at reasonable
cost.
Building additional conventional coal-fired power
plants should not be part of Colorado’s electricity future,
considering the following factors:
- Colorado already gets about 75% of its
electricity from coal-fired power plants. Adding more coal
plants will not diversify Colorado’s electricity supply.
- New conventional coal-fired power plants are
very expensive and time-consuming to build. Tri-State’s recently
built 400 MW coal-fired power plant (Springerville 3 unit) in
Arizona cost over $800 million, more than $2,000 per kW. Xcel
Energy is currently seeking a 10% rate increase to pay, in part,
for its new coal plant in Pueblo.
- Conventional coal-fired power plants emit
vast amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main pollutant causing
global warming. States such as California are starting to adopt
regulations on CO2 emissions from power plants; national
regulations on CO2 emissions and/or CO2 emissions taxes are
likely in the coming years. Such regulations and/or taxes will
further increase the cost of electricity from coal-fired power
plants. In addition, it is worth noting that Idaho has place a
moratorium on the construction of new coal plants, and Texas and
New Mexico rejected proposed coal plants, due to concerns about
increased pollutant emissions.
- Coal prices are rising and are now more than
twice the level of a few years ago. Building new coal-fired
power plants in Colorado and other western states would place
further upward pressure on coal prices, and thus increase our
electricity bills. There are also concerns about the reliability
of coal supply given problems in coal transport by rail.
The Colorado Energy Forum’s report devotes a good deal
of attention to the adverse economic impacts of rising electricity
prices and rising utility bills. Fortunately, we can limit further
increases in utility bills through much greater reliance on
cost-effective energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies,
technologies which have proven their many benefits to consumers in
recent years.
Bottom line: Energy efficiency and renewable
energy, not conventional coal-fired power plants, are the best
choices for Colorado’s electricity future from the perspective of
saving money, improving reliability, limiting risk, and protecting
the environment. |